Recent News

Srey Neth First App Code

Saturday, October 14, 2017

When Making a Movie Is Not Considered an Exercise of Free Speech

When Making a Movie Is Not Considered an Exercise of Free Speech

There are many instances where the screenplay that becomes a movie is copied by someone that may or may not be connected to the original creator. Some of these situations involve the originator not being paid, not being represented or not being given credit for what he or she has created. This could be considered theft or infringement of intellectual property if the work was copyrighted. When there are other factors, this could lead to a litigation battle in court.

The first person to make the screenplay would have participated in an act of free speech, but the new work may be a copy or mostly a reproduction of the initial screenplay document. The freedom of speech and acts within the concept are often difficult to explain. However, there are several rights under this freedom. One such right is to refrain from speaking at all. It may be permitted to speak offensive words, to speak out against political affiliations, to contribute through monetary means and to advertise through this right to United States citizens. This then extends to creating videos, messages, audio clips and movies.

This may be through symbolic means or literal concepts. Many movies are created with symbolic speech explained through graphical representations. Theft of this IP is not an exercise of free speech. Theft of Material Free speech is the framework that usually governs the making of movies. The screenplay creator envisions certain actions, scenes and character development and dialogue. This could be a metaphor for something occurring in the real world, an allegory, a representation of certain internal conflicts or other important exercises in free speech. However, some screenplay writers find their original work stolen and reproduced in part or in entirety.

This may depend on certain factors. There are numerous instances of intellectual property being stolen outside of the United States and then shared or reproduced in various countries. However, it does occur within America as well. While the details about screenplay theft are generally unknown and swept under the rug, some individuals are so affected they attempt to take the matter to civil court. One complication could be if the work was not copyrighted and the person that authored it has no evidence that the thief actually stole anything. Some are paranoid about these situations and prepare.

When the screenplay writer is an unknown in the movie world, it may be easier to misappropriate the IP. However, if the circumstances of the movie being created are due to the theft, this is not an exercise in free speech. Free Speech Covered Freedom of expression is usually what is involved in making movies.

This expression is subjective, and could be restricted based on state, country or organizations placing limitations on the freedom of speech rights of the film makers. However, such issues as pornography, artistic interpretations and complications of the subject matter not being connected to free speech may change who and how a film may be viewed. It is then important to know what free speech is within the United States.

This means defining it based on each individual situation. Some cases go to the courts so restrictions may be lifted and others require further help through the Supreme Court. Some movies are involved in contractual agreements. Those that have signed such documents may be restricted from various activities and changing a movie too far from the approve script.

This could exclude free speech as it is no longer free but part of something that has been approved for the masses. If the screenplay writer is affected in this manner, and his or her right of free speech is impeded, he or she may be able to seek a legal remedy to these circumstances. Lawyers in Movie Making Processes Whether ahas been stolen or the right of free speech has been compromised, it is often important to hire a lawyer to assist with the matter. This legal representative may be able to help in seeking a remedy to the problem or compensation when it is needed.


2 comments: